<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
 <journal>
 <language>En</language>
 <journal_id_issn>1680-6433</journal_id_issn>
 <journal_id_issn_online>2008-2177</journal_id_issn_online>
 <journal_id_pubmed></journal_id_pubmed>
 <journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
 <journal_id_doi></journal_id_doi>
 <journal_id_isnet></journal_id_isnet>
 <journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
 <journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
 <journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>

 <pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1387</year>
	<month>8</month>
	<day>12</day>
 </pubdate>
 <pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2008</year>
	<month>11</month>
	<day>2</day>
 </pubdate>
 <volume>6</volume>
 <number>4</number>

 <publish_type>online</publish_type>
 <publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
 <article_type>fulltext</article_type>

<articleset>
	<article>
	<language>En</language>
	<article_id_issn>1680-6433</article_id_issn>
	<article_id_issn_online>2008-2177</article_id_issn_online>
	<article_id_pubmed></article_id_pubmed>
	<article_id_pii></article_id_pii>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<article_id_isnet></article_id_isnet>
	<article_id_iranmedex></article_id_iranmedex>
	<article_id_magiran></article_id_magiran>
	<article_id_sid></article_id_sid>
	
	<title_fa>Fusion and development of 2-cell bovine embryos to tetraploid blastocyst with different voltages and durations</title_fa>
	<title>Fusion and development of 2-cell bovine embryos to tetraploid blastocyst with different voltages and durations</title>
	<subject_fa/>
	<subject/>
	
	<content_type_fa></content_type_fa>
	<content_type></content_type>
	
	
	<abstract_fa>Background: The values of embryonic stem cell and cloning are evident. Production of clone from embryonic stem cells can be achieved by introduction of stem cell into a tetraploid blastocyst. Tetraploid blastocyst can be produced in vitro by electrofusion of 2-cell embryos.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different voltages and durations on fusion rate of bovine 2-cell embryos and their subsequent development in vitro.	
Material and Methods: The in vitro produced bovine 2-cell embryos were categorized into 3 groups: (1) fused group (FG); 2-cell embryos fused by exposure to different voltages (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25 and 1.5 kV/cm) and durations (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 Î¼s), (2) exposed control group (ECG);  2-cell embryos exposed to different voltages and durations but remained unfused and (3) unexposed control group (UCG); embryos cultured without exposure to any voltage. The embryos from each group were cultured and fusion, cleavage and developmental rates were compared in each group.
Results: The results show that increased voltage, increases the fusion rate up to 88% for 1.5 kV/cm; however, the rate of cleavage and blastocyst formation decreases significantly to 18% and 10% respectively (p&amp;amp;lt;0.05). Increased duration does not significantly increase fusion rate, however, in high voltage, increased duration decreases cleavage rate and blastocyst formation rate. Blastocyst formation rate in UCG showed a better development (32%) compared to FG (20%) or ECG (22.5%) (p&amp;amp;lt;0.05).
Conclusion: It can be concluded that for optimal fusion, cleavage and development, one pulse of 0.75 kV/cm for 60Î¼s should be applied.
</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>Background: The values of embryonic stem cell and cloning are evident. Production of clone from embryonic stem cells can be achieved by introduction of stem cell into a tetraploid blastocyst. Tetraploid blastocyst can be produced in vitro by electrofusion of 2-cell embryos.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different voltages and durations on fusion rate of bovine 2-cell embryos and their subsequent development in vitro.	
Material and Methods: The in vitro produced bovine 2-cell embryos were categorized into 3 groups: (1) fused group (FG); 2-cell embryos fused by exposure to different voltages (0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25 and 1.5 kV/cm) and durations (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 Î¼s), (2) exposed control group (ECG);  2-cell embryos exposed to different voltages and durations but remained unfused and (3) unexposed control group (UCG); embryos cultured without exposure to any voltage. The embryos from each group were cultured and fusion, cleavage and developmental rates were compared in each group.
Results: The results show that increased voltage, increases the fusion rate up to 88% for 1.5 kV/cm; however, the rate of cleavage and blastocyst formation decreases significantly to 18% and 10% respectively (p&amp;amp;lt;0.05). Increased duration does not significantly increase fusion rate, however, in high voltage, increased duration decreases cleavage rate and blastocyst formation rate. Blastocyst formation rate in UCG showed a better development (32%) compared to FG (20%) or ECG (22.5%) (p&amp;amp;lt;0.05).
Conclusion: It can be concluded that for optimal fusion, cleavage and development, one pulse of 0.75 kV/cm for 60Î¼s should be applied.
</abstract>

	<keyword_fa>Bovine, Embryo, Development, Electrofusion, Tetraploid.</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Bovine, Embryo, Development, Electrofusion, Tetraploid.</keyword>
	<start_page>181</start_page>
	<end_page>186</end_page>
	<web_url></web_url>
	<web_url></web_url>
	<author_list>
	<author>
		<first_name>Mohamad Reza </first_name>
		<middle_name/>
		<last_name>Darabi</last_name>
		<suffix/>
		<affiliation></affiliation>
		<first_name_fa>Mohamad Reza </first_name_fa>
		<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
		<last_name_fa>Darabi</last_name_fa>
		<suffix_fa/>
		<email>-</email>
		<code></code>
		<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
		<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	</author>
	<author>
		<first_name>Mohamad Hosein</first_name>
		<middle_name/>
		<last_name>Nasr-Esfahani</last_name>
		<suffix/>
		<affiliation></affiliation>
		<first_name_fa>Mohamad Hosein </first_name_fa>
		<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
		<last_name_fa>Nasr-Esfahani</last_name_fa>
		<suffix_fa/>
		<email>mh.nasr-esfahani@royaninstitute.org</email>
		<code></code>
		<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
		<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	</author>
	</author_list>
</article>
</articleset></journal>
  
